The Silly Season for Right Wing National Security Wonks

We are getting to the season when the conservative think tank types try to paint the more wild conservatives as potential “isolationists” and then use the same paintbrush against liberals who are critical of wasteful defense spending.  They imply that if one questions how and why we have gone to war in Iraq (a war based on a lie), and Afghanistan (better reason but perhaps more misguided in strategy and execution).

The real aim of this smearing is to pump up the DOD dollars for their “fellow travelers” and supporters in the defense industry.  At exactly the same moment they try to spend many more tax dollars on defense, their non-national security colleagues deride government spending and bemoan high taxes on the rich, who are profiting off this war. Proof of this can be found in the op-ed cited below.

There are a number of convenient conservative myths in the op-ed article “Is freedom’s price too high for the right?” by Danielle Plaetka and Thomas Donnelly (Washington Post, September 24, 2010). While they cite some interesting poll figures about American attitudes about American leadership and a strong defense, the fact remain there is a increasingly larger number of people who question the efficacy of our military involvement especially in Afghanistan and also Iraq.  But the issue at hand is not polling figures but U.S. national interests and global security.

The biggest fallacy in this article is the assumption that American leadership is largely defined just by our military intervention. Many experts, including myself, are of the opinion that often military intervention acts as a counter-weight to the effective management of security. For example, instead of defeating terrorism our military action has too often acted as a recruiting tool for terrorist groups.

The old argument that those who oppose excessive military spending are isolationists is a red herring dating back to the McCarthy era.  I am no isolationist, but I support wise engagement not stupid ones nor those based on falsification. As to DOD budget numbers, the authors again apply twisted arguments when they say “In the longer term budgetary shortfalls in defense inevitably affect our willingness and ability to take on challenges.” First, our current defense expenditures are equal to the expenditures of the next ten countries including our close allies.  And some of the money still goes to systems more appropriate to the cold war than to 21st century realities.

Indeed I am happy to know that Americans still support a robust role for America in world affairs, and they are correctly concerned by the so-called “war on terrorism.” But we should not equate doubt about foolish escalation of military expenditures and even more so that withdrawal from a bad and wrong “battlefield” would lead to a “retreat from the world.” Perhaps it would focus our attention on more effective and less costly preventive diplomacy.

I also object to the ad homonym attack on former Sen. George McGovern, a World War II hero airman, who is no isolationist.

2 thoughts on “The Silly Season for Right Wing National Security Wonks

  1. Charles B. Ketcham October 5, 2010 / 4:05 PM

    I am pleased to read Harry Blaney’s summary remarks about excessive trust in military spending and intervention:”Indeed I am happy to know that Americans still support a robust role for America in world affairs, and they are correctly concerned by the so-called ‘war on terrorism.’ But we should…focus our attention on more effective and less costly preventative diplomacy.”

    Such a judgment reflects the insightful and prescient observations of Tony Judt published in 2008 in his book “REAPPRAISALS, Reflections on the Forgotten Twentieth Century”: “There are reasons to believe that…fear is reemerging as an active ingredient of political life in Western democracies. Fear of terrorism, of course; but also, and perhaps more insidiously, fear of the uncontrollable speed of change, fear of the loss of employment, fear of losing ground to others in an increasingly unequal distribution of resources, fear of losing control of the circumstances and routines of one’s daily life. And, perhaps above all, fear that it is not just we who can no longer shape our lives but that those in authority have lost control as well, to forces beyond their reach….The politics of insecurity are contagious.” [pp. 20-21]

  2. Chuck Woolery October 4, 2010 / 2:31 AM

    The false assumption of most ‘national security’ experts is that we can achieve greater security by increasing our nation’s military spending…or by decreasing it. But in today’s increasingly high tech world, security is not a function of armament or disarmament. It is increasingly a function of global cooperation. The capacity for nations, groups or individuals to make or acquire WMD is increasing at an exponential rate. Our linear mental capacity for dealing with the WMD threat and other similar threats to our national security is insufficient. And worse yet, our Governments ability to deal with any serious national security threats like pandemics or economic recessions/depressions is essentially flat lined.

    I think it would be fair to claim that it is US Christian extremists and fiscal conservative ideologues that have contributed most to putting our nation on a foundation of insecurity. Both have devalued investments in the technological and moral capital essential to increasing the global cooperation needed to protect our nation’s security and our cherished freedoms.
    Evolution is more than a theory. We may not be evolving but our technology is. And, it is a double edged sword that can be used for construction or destruction…the most amazing medicines or most lethal WMD…energy independence or mortal dependence, education and caring or oblivion.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s