<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Rethinking National Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cipnationalsecurity.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cipnationalsecurity.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>An Alternative Perspective on Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 22:17:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SYRIA UP-DATE: AFTER GENEVA II, THEN WHAT? by Harry C. Blaney III</title>
		<link>http://cipnationalsecurity.wordpress.com/2014/02/20/syria-up-date-after-geneva-ii-then-what/#comment-4977</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harry C. Blaney III]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 22:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cipnationalsecurity.wordpress.com/2014/02/20/syria-up-date-after-geneva-ii-then-what/#comment-4977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul has asked a serious question, aside from his direct thought on the use of CIA drones. Behind that comment is the larger question of how to manager in advance a crisis and whether we can find less costly ways to deal with conflict than either totally standing down or making costly “full court war” ourselves. And yes Paul, there are tools from more careful focused military support to quiet and undercover assistance and actions which can change the playing field. But we need the international community to be more effective and proactive and also use better peacekeeping and peacemaking tools.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul has asked a serious question, aside from his direct thought on the use of CIA drones. Behind that comment is the larger question of how to manager in advance a crisis and whether we can find less costly ways to deal with conflict than either totally standing down or making costly “full court war” ourselves. And yes Paul, there are tools from more careful focused military support to quiet and undercover assistance and actions which can change the playing field. But we need the international community to be more effective and proactive and also use better peacekeeping and peacemaking tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DEFENSE BUDGET (NEW ONE IN THE WORKS, MAYBE) AND PERHAPS A REAL, MODERN, FORWARD LOOKING DEFENSE POSTURE? by Harry C. Blaney III</title>
		<link>http://cipnationalsecurity.wordpress.com/2014/02/25/defense-budget-new-one-in-the-works-maybe-and-perhaps-a-real-modern-forward-looking-defense-posture/#comment-4976</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harry C. Blaney III]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 21:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cipnationalsecurity.wordpress.com/?p=4121#comment-4976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sad to say already the defense hawks in Congress and their paymasters in the military-industrial sector and their lobbyists are attacking the DOD proposed budget. according to news reports. Bob sadly was right. Leading the hawks charge are Senators John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) McCain said &quot;We live in an ever increasingly dangerous world and this budget is out of touch with reality.&quot; 

The problem is that these republicans are responsible for the sequestration cuts which go even deeper than the Hagel proposal.  They are also against tax increases which if we are in such danger would from the 1to 2% would help reduce these cuts with real marginal increases at the top and doing away with the tax dodge &quot;carried interest&quot; of the rich Wall Street billionaires. But they rather it be taken from our young and their education including early education, the old from Social Security, Medicare, and from our poor by killing unemployment benefits including our veterans and Medicaid.

Reports also indicate they some Democrats are “lukewarm” in response and many are obsequious to the military establishments in their state especially defense contractors and cuts in Reserves and national Guard. Even the respected Senator Carl Levin (D-Mich.) said he had concerns about the cuts as did Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) But they support the White House imitative that would add $66 billion into the 2015 budgets, split between defense and non-defense areas. But may GOP legislator are wedded to the sequester no matter what the hurt it will cause when it again starts in full in 2016. 

What is lacking in the hawks defense of more war spending based on their special interests, not the realities of our world despite their cries we live in dangerous times....which they have contributed to by the Iraq war and getting us into new wars, is not supporting  less costly preemptive diplomacy and the U.N. and other international organization that can make a difference on the gound before we reach a real war. 


 

The problem is that these republicans are responsible for the sequestration cuts which go even deeper than the Hagel proposal.  They are also against tax increases which if we are in such danger would from the 1to 2% would help reduce these cuts with real marginal increases at the top and doing away with the tax dodge &quot;carried interest&quot; of the rich Wall Street billionairs. But they rather it be taken from our young and their education including early education, the old from Social Security, Medicare, and from our poor by killling unemployment benefits including our veterians and Medicade.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad to say already the defense hawks in Congress and their paymasters in the military-industrial sector and their lobbyists are attacking the DOD proposed budget. according to news reports. Bob sadly was right. Leading the hawks charge are Senators John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) McCain said &#8220;We live in an ever increasingly dangerous world and this budget is out of touch with reality.&#8221; </p>
<p>The problem is that these republicans are responsible for the sequestration cuts which go even deeper than the Hagel proposal.  They are also against tax increases which if we are in such danger would from the 1to 2% would help reduce these cuts with real marginal increases at the top and doing away with the tax dodge &#8220;carried interest&#8221; of the rich Wall Street billionaires. But they rather it be taken from our young and their education including early education, the old from Social Security, Medicare, and from our poor by killing unemployment benefits including our veterans and Medicaid.</p>
<p>Reports also indicate they some Democrats are “lukewarm” in response and many are obsequious to the military establishments in their state especially defense contractors and cuts in Reserves and national Guard. Even the respected Senator Carl Levin (D-Mich.) said he had concerns about the cuts as did Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) But they support the White House imitative that would add $66 billion into the 2015 budgets, split between defense and non-defense areas. But may GOP legislator are wedded to the sequester no matter what the hurt it will cause when it again starts in full in 2016. </p>
<p>What is lacking in the hawks defense of more war spending based on their special interests, not the realities of our world despite their cries we live in dangerous times&#8230;.which they have contributed to by the Iraq war and getting us into new wars, is not supporting  less costly preemptive diplomacy and the U.N. and other international organization that can make a difference on the gound before we reach a real war. </p>
<p>The problem is that these republicans are responsible for the sequestration cuts which go even deeper than the Hagel proposal.  They are also against tax increases which if we are in such danger would from the 1to 2% would help reduce these cuts with real marginal increases at the top and doing away with the tax dodge &#8220;carried interest&#8221; of the rich Wall Street billionairs. But they rather it be taken from our young and their education including early education, the old from Social Security, Medicare, and from our poor by killling unemployment benefits including our veterians and Medicade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DEFENSE BUDGET (NEW ONE IN THE WORKS, MAYBE) AND PERHAPS A REAL, MODERN, FORWARD LOOKING DEFENSE POSTURE? by Robert Lamoree</title>
		<link>http://cipnationalsecurity.wordpress.com/2014/02/25/defense-budget-new-one-in-the-works-maybe-and-perhaps-a-real-modern-forward-looking-defense-posture/#comment-4974</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Lamoree]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 03:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cipnationalsecurity.wordpress.com/?p=4121#comment-4974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sanity in spending, sanity of purpose . . . I think we have been missing both for far too long.  Now that the pentagon has opted to control spending and waste, we are about to see the strong arm of the forces that Eisenhower warned us of come into play.  Weapons mean money, money buys influence, and diplomacy does not put money into people&#039;s pockets.  We are about to witness a war of wills . . . one of common sense vs. one of monied interests.  

Any predictions?  If current history is an indicator, bet on the monied interests.  Sad, isn&#039;t it!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sanity in spending, sanity of purpose . . . I think we have been missing both for far too long.  Now that the pentagon has opted to control spending and waste, we are about to see the strong arm of the forces that Eisenhower warned us of come into play.  Weapons mean money, money buys influence, and diplomacy does not put money into people&#8217;s pockets.  We are about to witness a war of wills . . . one of common sense vs. one of monied interests.  </p>
<p>Any predictions?  If current history is an indicator, bet on the monied interests.  Sad, isn&#8217;t it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SYRIA UP-DATE: AFTER GENEVA II, THEN WHAT? by Paul Sack</title>
		<link>http://cipnationalsecurity.wordpress.com/2014/02/20/syria-up-date-after-geneva-ii-then-what/#comment-4958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Sack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 18:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cipnationalsecurity.wordpress.com/2014/02/20/syria-up-date-after-geneva-ii-then-what/#comment-4958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There should be some limit to the number of his people that any ruthless dictator is allowed to kill.  Assad has long exceeded it, and he is the problem.  Where are the CIA drones when we need them?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There should be some limit to the number of his people that any ruthless dictator is allowed to kill.  Assad has long exceeded it, and he is the problem.  Where are the CIA drones when we need them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on America’s Role in Making Peace in the Middle East by puertoricoluxe.com</title>
		<link>http://cipnationalsecurity.wordpress.com/2013/04/22/americas-role-in-making-peace-in-the-middle-east/#comment-4909</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[puertoricoluxe.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2014 18:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cipnationalsecurity.wordpress.com/?p=3660#comment-4909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hurrah! Finally I got a webpage from where I can really get valuable information concerning 
my study and knowledge.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hurrah! Finally I got a webpage from where I can really get valuable information concerning<br />
my study and knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SYRIA: DIPLOMATIC AND OTHER OPTIONS; BEYOND GENEVA II by indigestion</title>
		<link>http://cipnationalsecurity.wordpress.com/2014/01/27/syria-diplomatic-and-other-options-beyond-geneva-ii/#comment-4880</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[indigestion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cipnationalsecurity.wordpress.com/?p=4048#comment-4880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good answers in return of this matter with firm arguments and explaining all about that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good answers in return of this matter with firm arguments and explaining all about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2012 Candidate Quotes on Foreign Policy and Defense by Micheal L. Bartels</title>
		<link>http://cipnationalsecurity.wordpress.com/resources/candidate-quotes/#comment-4853</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Micheal L. Bartels]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2014 16:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cipnationalsecurity.wordpress.com/?page_id=2064#comment-4853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having read this I believed it was extremely enlightening. I appreciate you spending some time and energy to put this article together. I once again find myself personally spending a significant amount of time both reading and posting comments. But so what, it was still worthwhile!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having read this I believed it was extremely enlightening. I appreciate you spending some time and energy to put this article together. I once again find myself personally spending a significant amount of time both reading and posting comments. But so what, it was still worthwhile!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
